December 22nd, 2011
Fuglification by five: automotive
Have you ever noticed how car designers can really screw things up when they create a new ‘generation’ of a model? Quite often there’s a serious fuglification factor involved.
It’s like the old adage “never buy version 1.0 of a Microsoft product”, it sometimes takes a few updates/facelifts before the new generation achieves a balanced, harmonious look. And sometimes it never does, just stays plain fugly.
Here are five examples. (I’ll admit up-front, some of these vehicles weren’t absolute stunners before fuglification but they were at least adequate, even handsome.)
Mazda 3: 1st Gen to 2nd Gen
Definitely a case of a lovely looking car hit with the fugly stick. Especially the hot MPS version, which is a real shame. The 2nd gen is bigger (which I think is a running theme here in this list) but looks gangly and is smiling like a doofus. Fail.
Nissan X-Trail: 1st Gen to 2nd Gen
OK when I said some of these cars weren’t that great looking before, I was talking about the X-Trail. The first version wasn’t pretty, but the second is fugly. And bulbous…it’s got a big arse.
Subaru Liberty: 4th Gen to 5th Gen
Ahh the 4th gen Liberty, a really elegant design. But they had to make it fugly with the introduction of the lunchbox styling of the latest model. Sure it’s bigger, allowing Subaru to compete with the large sedans, wagons and SUVs in the family market, but it looks bad. I feel ill.
Holden Commodore: 3rd Gen to 4th Gen
The VZ was a refined evolution of the 3rd generation shape, a very nice looking vehicle. The VE that replaced it may be technically superior (it’s a “billion dollar design” after all) but it’s fugly. The HSV models based on the VE are much better looking, but the standard models look misshapen and boxy. I was disappoint.
Toyota Hilux: 6th Gen to 7th Gen
Where I grew up, real men drove a Hilux. Preferably a 4WD dual cab version. And the 6th generation were nice a design. But they got well and truly fuglified with the next model, especially the 2WD versions which look tubby and moronic. You’d look a right berk doing donuts in a paddock in one of those!
![2006 Nissan X-Trail [image credit: wikipedia]](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/48/Nissan_X-Trail_front_20080131.jpg)
![2010 Nissan X-Trail [image credit: caradvice.com.au]](http://www.caradvice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Nissan-X-Trail-1-625x415.jpg)
![2007 BL Subaru Liberty [image credit: subaruliberty.com]](http://www.subaruliberty.com/images/subaruliberty2007.jpg)
![2006 VZ Holden Commodore SS [image credit: drive.com.au]](http://images.drive.com.au/drive_images/Editorial/2006/03/09/hold_leadimage.jpg)
![2009 VE Holden Commodore SS [image credit: drive.com.au]](http://images.drive.com.au/drive_images/Editorial/2009/04/21/vecomm_m.jpg)
As an avid car nut, and having a taste for the unusual, I have long had a fascination for unique automotive specimens. Something intrigues me about the way guys funk up cars that would normally be driven by people not part of the modified car scene. An analogy for this is that it’s a mums car, like a station wagon. Hence the phrase 
