Using cultural probes for intranet user research
Published April 10th, 2008 in Consulting, Design research, IntranetsMy latest article has just been released, in which I interview Gerry Gaffney on the use of cultural probes in the context of intranet development. This was actually to return the favour extended by Gerry to interview me for his UX podcast. Here’s a taste:
Often it’s difficult to tell exactly who is using an intranet, and how they are using it. Obviously, some research is required to help answer these questions, but what technique can capture the tacit knowledge without shadowing users in an uncomfortable and expensive way?
A relatively recent research technique that can be very useful in this situation is known as a ‘cultural probe’. In essence, the technique involves getting users to give you information without you actually being there. Often this means giving them a diary to write things down in, but the technique can make use of all manner of objects.
I think there are many benefits to this technique for those designing, or redesigning, an intranet. Firstly, it’s often the case that intranet teams are working with very little budget, and thus including all user groups—say interstate or overseas—in research activities can be next to impossible. Sending out a probe which can collect data for you at low cost is a good solution.
It’s also a great way to reduce the ‘Hawthorne effect’, that is the effect you will have on those you are researching simply by being there. This effect is especially difficult for intranet teams to avoid, since they are often researching their own colleagues. It’s hard to blend into the background when you know everyone in the room! External consultants have it easy when it comes to quietly observing or doing contextual inquiries.
I really like the cultural probe technique, especially the sorts of whacky and creative things done by design researchers such as Bill Gaver. These might be a bit ‘out there’ for the corporate environment, but certainly get your attention.
(I’m interested in case studies that describe the use of probes, particularly ‘inside the firewall’. Have you probed your enterprise? What did you find?)
Popularity: 24% [?]
Search
Latest posts
Old favourites
Categories
- Accessibility (13)
- Automotive (11)
- Books (2)
- Conferences (39)
- Consulting (23)
- Design (6)
- Design research (28)
- Family (18)
- Humour (27)
- IA (43)
- Interactive marketing (3)
- Intranets (14)
- Music (14)
- Photos (7)
- Quotes (11)
- Ramblings (126)
- Speaking (21)
- Travel (23)
- Usability (28)
- User experience (41)
- Web 2.0 (7)
- Web design (46)
Archives
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
Where I do what you’re doing now
Code and technology
Creative and multimedia
Design research
KM, IM and strategy
Misc
UX, IA and IxD
- 37 signals signal vs noise
- Adaptive Path entries
- Andy Rutledge : Design View
- Austin Govella : Thinking and Making
- Boxes and Arrows
- Chris Khalil’s Musing
- Christina Wodtke : Eleganthack
- Christopher Fahey : Graphpaper
- Donna Maurer : DonnaM
- findability.org
- Good Experience
- Iain Barker : Simpler is Better
- InfoDesign
- Jared Spool : Brainsparks
- Jeff Veen
- Jesse James Garrett
- Joshua Ledwell : Compete on Usability
- Leisa Reichelt : Disambiguity
- Lou Rosenfeld : blougList
- Lyle Kantrovich
- Martin Hardee : Sun.com Design
- OK/Cancel
- Peter Merholz
- Peter Van Dijck’s Guide to Ease
- Shane Morris : UXB
- Steve Baty : Doc Holds Forth
- Todd Warfel
- UsableWorld
- UX Matters
- Zef Fugaz : zef[a]media


We have used a bunch of interesting probes (always makes me giggle) to explore all manner of things. The Intranet here hasn’t been one of them unfortunately.
I think one of the most interesting results from one of our other probes came from a study we were doing into neighborhood cohesiveness where we asked people to draw a map of their local area and then overlay that map with the people they knew, and how likely they would be to do them a favor, like collect their mail while they were away.
There really didn’t seem to be a close correlation with distance and likelihood, but a stronger correlation between shared interests and chances for social contacts (e.g. kids, jobs, common butchers :-) etc.)
Thanks Stephen. So what was in the probe kit? And how many pre/post visits did you do? That seems to be a really key, but easily overlooked, part of the method.