Testing a Web site’s first impression
Published February 20th, 2008 in User experienceI spotted this in the TechSmith User Experience Newsletter. Although it talks specifically about using their Morae software package, the article by Todd Follansbee is rather useful:
Have you ever clicked a Google search result, taken one glance at the site, and clicked away? For whatever reason, that site made a bad first impression on you.
In this month’s guest-authored article, Todd Follansbee, lead consultant for Web Marketing Resources, shares how user testing can measure visitors’ first impressions of a Web site.
Todd discusses how to use personality profiles, find the best environment for testing, and provide a realistic “starting point” with Google. He lists specific questions to ask, and what you should learn from users’ answers.
Todd’s approach considers both traditional usability factors and persuasive elements of messaging, branding, and benefits.
“…if you cannot motivate the user to enter the site, good usability is wasted,” he said.
Todd often does his user testing on-site, in a business or a home. He uses Morae usability testing software to record users’ interactions with the Web site, uncover patterns in the data, and share highlight videos with stakeholders.
“Using Morae to record messaging, persona behavior and the persuasive elements of conversion will make you money both by improving your Web sites and offering new services as consultants,” he said.
This is a great example of the intersection between marketing and UX, and the approach is really how most usability ‘testing’ should be done in my opinion. Whilst I don’t use Morae myself, I think the general approach of gauging reactions to websites by first time users is very useful. The same results could be achieved using Camtasia (or similar) or without any software at all.
Popularity: 21% [?]
Search
Latest posts
Old favourites
Categories
- Accessibility (13)
- Automotive (10)
- Books (2)
- Conferences (33)
- Consulting (21)
- Design (6)
- Design research (24)
- Family (18)
- Humour (27)
- IA (40)
- Interactive marketing (3)
- Intranets (14)
- Music (14)
- Photos (7)
- Quotes (11)
- Ramblings (121)
- Speaking (17)
- Travel (23)
- Usability (24)
- User experience (35)
- Web 2.0 (6)
- Web design (44)
Archives
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
Where I do what you’re doing now
Code and technology
Creative and multimedia
Design research
KM, IM and strategy
Misc
UX, IA and IxD
- 37 signals signal vs noise
- Adaptive Path entries
- Andy Rutledge : Design View
- Austin Govella : Thinking and Making
- Boxes and Arrows
- Chris Khalil’s Musing
- Christina Wodtke : Eleganthack
- Christopher Fahey : Graphpaper
- Donna Maurer : DonnaM
- findability.org
- Good Experience
- Iain Barker : Simpler is Better
- InfoDesign
- Jared Spool : Brainsparks
- Jeff Veen
- Jesse James Garrett
- Joshua Ledwell : Compete on Usability
- Leisa Reichelt : Disambiguity
- Lou Rosenfeld : blougList
- Lyle Kantrovich
- Martin Hardee : Sun.com Design
- OK/Cancel
- Peter Merholz
- Peter Van Dijck’s Guide to Ease
- Shane Morris : UXB
- Steve Baty : Doc Holds Forth
- Todd Warfel
- UsableWorld
- UX Matters
- Zef Fugaz : zef[a]media


No Responses to “Testing a Web site’s first impression”
Please Wait
Leave a Reply