Intranet redesign for Canon
Published October 11th, 2007 in Consulting, Design research, IA, IntranetsAfter an embarrassingly long time, I have finally finished a case study of an intranet redesign project I did for Canon more than a year ago.
This project highlighted that intranets do not need to be structured in the ‘traditional’ way (ie like public websites).
Instead of a single home page and a rigid view of the site, a fresh approach was taken, and the information architecture for [this intranet] makes use of personalisation to efficiently meet the needs of Canon staff.
Lastly, it is worth noting that the information architecture techniques devised for websites apply equally to intranets, sometimes more so. This is a key lesson for experienced information architecture practitioners.
Continuing my ‘exclusive tips’ for those who read my blog, what you won’t read much about in the article is the intranet alignment workshop we ran.
In any organisation, there are many stakeholders who are involved in the design or management of the intranet. The first challenge confronting many intranet projects therefore becomes to create a common vision for the intranet, to align the many stakeholders, and to define the role that each stakeholder will play.
Ask anyone who has worked in a large organisation on a website or intranet project, and they will tell you that getting management buy-in can be very difficult. Political battles over ownership of the site, and thus over its redesign, are commonplace. And without some early alignment and consensus, trying to get approval for design ideas later on can be heartbreaking.
Just a half-day workshop, held after some initial needs analysis has been performed, can work wonders. Key stakeholders get their chance to give their input, they can see progress is being made, and as a group can discuss those things that are often assumed (like what is the intranet for?).
Popularity: 11% [?]
Search
Latest posts
Old favourites
Categories
- Accessibility (13)
- Automotive (10)
- Books (2)
- Conferences (36)
- Consulting (21)
- Design (6)
- Design research (28)
- Family (18)
- Humour (27)
- IA (42)
- Interactive marketing (3)
- Intranets (14)
- Music (14)
- Photos (7)
- Quotes (11)
- Ramblings (124)
- Speaking (19)
- Travel (23)
- Usability (26)
- User experience (38)
- Web 2.0 (6)
- Web design (46)
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
Where I do what you’re doing now
Code and technology
Creative and multimedia
Design research
KM, IM and strategy
Misc
UX, IA and IxD
- 37 signals signal vs noise
- Adaptive Path entries
- Andy Rutledge : Design View
- Austin Govella : Thinking and Making
- Boxes and Arrows
- Chris Khalil’s Musing
- Christina Wodtke : Eleganthack
- Christopher Fahey : Graphpaper
- Donna Maurer : DonnaM
- findability.org
- Good Experience
- Iain Barker : Simpler is Better
- InfoDesign
- Jared Spool : Brainsparks
- Jeff Veen
- Jesse James Garrett
- Joshua Ledwell : Compete on Usability
- Leisa Reichelt : Disambiguity
- Lou Rosenfeld : blougList
- Lyle Kantrovich
- Martin Hardee : Sun.com Design
- OK/Cancel
- Peter Merholz
- Peter Van Dijck’s Guide to Ease
- Shane Morris : UXB
- Steve Baty : Doc Holds Forth
- Todd Warfel
- UsableWorld
- UX Matters
- Zef Fugaz : zef[a]media

