<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Data Driven Personas &#8211; UPA 2007 Tutorial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gurtle.com/ppov/2007/06/13/data-driven-personas-upa-2007-tutorial/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gurtle.com/ppov/2007/06/13/data-driven-personas-upa-2007-tutorial</link>
	<description>the personal website of Patrick Kennedy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:30:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: toddwarfel.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Looking Back on Data-Driven Design Research Personas</title>
		<link>http://www.gurtle.com/ppov/2007/06/13/data-driven-personas-upa-2007-tutorial/comment-page-1#comment-6159</link>
		<dc:creator>toddwarfel.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Looking Back on Data-Driven Design Research Personas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gurtle.com/ppov/2007/06/13/data-driven-personas-upa-2007-tutorial/#comment-6159</guid>
		<description>[...] Yesterday I taught a day long tutorial at UPA 2007 on data-driven design research personas. Patrick Kennedy has written a nice good review of the tutorial. I say &#8220;good,&#8221; rather than &#8220;nice,&#8221; because it&#8217;s honest. And honest isn&#8217;t always all positive. While most of what Patrick says about the tutorial was positive, he does highlight a few oversights, or areas the tutorial could have been better. And for that, I thank you, Patrick. I&#8217;ll take honesty any day over being nice and PC. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yesterday I taught a day long tutorial at UPA 2007 on data-driven design research personas. Patrick Kennedy has written a nice good review of the tutorial. I say &#8220;good,&#8221; rather than &#8220;nice,&#8221; because it&#8217;s honest. And honest isn&#8217;t always all positive. While most of what Patrick says about the tutorial was positive, he does highlight a few oversights, or areas the tutorial could have been better. And for that, I thank you, Patrick. I&#8217;ll take honesty any day over being nice and PC. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Zaki Warfel</title>
		<link>http://www.gurtle.com/ppov/2007/06/13/data-driven-personas-upa-2007-tutorial/comment-page-1#comment-6158</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Zaki Warfel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gurtle.com/ppov/2007/06/13/data-driven-personas-upa-2007-tutorial/#comment-6158</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the thorough review, Pat. As someone who comes at this from the point of view of balancing theory with practice, I too struggle sometimes with the purist academic viewpoint of hard core statistical significance in data. It&#039;s a balancing act in the real world. Additionally, at &lt;a href=&quot;http://messagefirst.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Messagefirst&lt;/a&gt; we&#039;re continually walking the tightrope of balancing qualitative and quantitative data in our work. It&#039;s a real shame that people today can&#039;t recognize the value of both of these types of data. 

Thanks for point out the areas it could have been better. As a practitioner, I&#039;m always striving to improve what we&#039;re doing. I&#039;ll definitely take these things to heart for the next time.

So, next time, I&#039;ll have some real data for attendees to work from. And I&#039;m going to have them begin by developing personas at the start. Then we&#039;ll introduce some techniques and data and have them evolve their personas. That will be the format used throughout the course, as I think there&#039;s a great value in seeing them evolve through the process - something else that was part of the persona lifecycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the thorough review, Pat. As someone who comes at this from the point of view of balancing theory with practice, I too struggle sometimes with the purist academic viewpoint of hard core statistical significance in data. It&#8217;s a balancing act in the real world. Additionally, at <a href="http://messagefirst.com" rel="nofollow">Messagefirst</a> we&#8217;re continually walking the tightrope of balancing qualitative and quantitative data in our work. It&#8217;s a real shame that people today can&#8217;t recognize the value of both of these types of data. </p>
<p>Thanks for point out the areas it could have been better. As a practitioner, I&#8217;m always striving to improve what we&#8217;re doing. I&#8217;ll definitely take these things to heart for the next time.</p>
<p>So, next time, I&#8217;ll have some real data for attendees to work from. And I&#8217;m going to have them begin by developing personas at the start. Then we&#8217;ll introduce some techniques and data and have them evolve their personas. That will be the format used throughout the course, as I think there&#8217;s a great value in seeing them evolve through the process &#8211; something else that was part of the persona lifecycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
