Too much choice is unusable
Published January 29th, 2007 in Design research, Ramblings, UsabilityOn the weekend I found myself in a furniture store (as you do…once you’re married) and this particular store sells only sofas, which you can pretty much configure endlessly to match what you want. So there’s a huge number of options for width, height, length, arm size, arm style, cushion style, fabrics and feet. Fabulous flexibility.
This is good, right? Everybody wants options. Well what I’ve noticed (I’ve been in there more than a few times now) is that this confuses the hell out of customers. People spend literally hours in the store trying to play around with the configuration of their new sofa, locked in a verbal wrestle with the sales assistants. They sometimes comment that the poor girls working there get confused themselves and often don’t quote the same price twice. I’m not surprised, there’s too much choice!
Infinite flexibility leads to infinite options and a greatly reduced chance of the customer being able to make a decision–I mean this is the future of your home we’re talking about, a topic not to be taken lightly :)
Contrast this with your average furniture retailer. You walk in, they have this, this and this ‘model’ of sofa. Perhaps you can change the colour but that’s usually about it. You either like what they’ve got or you don’t. Sounds rather restrictive, but people buy stuff in this way day in and day out. They have a reduced set of choices, but are easily able to come to terms with those choices and can make a decision. Factor into this the weeks, if not months, of furniture shopping which husbands…err, I mean people, typically go through and the decision becomes even easier. Ahh, the power of apathy.
So I think this is yet another case of a business model based on what sounds like what people want, but the reality is that it’s diametrically opposed to what they really want once they’re in the shop. Possibly this would work better if it was done through a website that customers could interrogate with all conceivable combinations of options and get a price, as opposed to a human salesperson. Yet it’s still altogether too much choice, especially when you can go next door for the wham-bam-thank-you-maam shopping experience.
Counter-thought: perhaps this is only the case when shopping to a budget (which I always seem to be). If you had unlimited money to spend, then being able to just pick exactly the bits you wanted might work well. Trying to handle the complexity of the choices available and keep the finished sofa under a certain dollar figure, that’s hard. It means that rather than ‘following your heart’ and simply choose what you want, you end up going around in circles in an effort to find a balance between options and price.
Or maybe this whole problem exists because I’m a man; women probably have some genetic ability to handle infinite choice, like multi-tasking.
Popularity: 5% [?]
Search
Latest posts
Old favourites
Categories
- Accessibility (13)
- Automotive (10)
- Books (2)
- Conferences (36)
- Consulting (21)
- Design (6)
- Design research (28)
- Family (18)
- Humour (27)
- IA (42)
- Interactive marketing (3)
- Intranets (14)
- Music (14)
- Photos (7)
- Quotes (11)
- Ramblings (124)
- Speaking (19)
- Travel (23)
- Usability (26)
- User experience (38)
- Web 2.0 (6)
- Web design (46)
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
Where I do what you’re doing now
Code and technology
Creative and multimedia
Design research
KM, IM and strategy
Misc
UX, IA and IxD
- 37 signals signal vs noise
- Adaptive Path entries
- Andy Rutledge : Design View
- Austin Govella : Thinking and Making
- Boxes and Arrows
- Chris Khalil’s Musing
- Christina Wodtke : Eleganthack
- Christopher Fahey : Graphpaper
- Donna Maurer : DonnaM
- findability.org
- Good Experience
- Iain Barker : Simpler is Better
- InfoDesign
- Jared Spool : Brainsparks
- Jeff Veen
- Jesse James Garrett
- Joshua Ledwell : Compete on Usability
- Leisa Reichelt : Disambiguity
- Lou Rosenfeld : blougList
- Lyle Kantrovich
- Martin Hardee : Sun.com Design
- OK/Cancel
- Peter Merholz
- Peter Van Dijck’s Guide to Ease
- Shane Morris : UXB
- Steve Baty : Doc Holds Forth
- Todd Warfel
- UsableWorld
- UX Matters
- Zef Fugaz : zef[a]media


No Responses to “Too much choice is unusable”
Please Wait
Leave a Reply