Not for the clumsy
Published March 16th, 2006 in RamblingsI was watching a documentary on SBS the other night (no, not one of those ones) about “Yamaksai”, the group of French guys who brought Parkour to the world’s attention.
Parkour (aka “free running” in the UK and US) is the nouveau sport where you basically run around, jumping on, over, through and across stuff. This description doesn’t adequately convey the elegance and athleticism of the manouveures, you have to see it to get the gist. I think it’s pretty cool, like a combination between martial arts and gymnastics. The best thing is that it was essentially born out of ghetto kids with bugger all else to do (or aspire to) who put their minds and bodies to creating something positive and enriching, rather than letting their circumstances get them down.
It’s now taken off around the world, striking an accord with youths in similar (and probably an increasing amount from disimilar) backgrounds. It also helps when major film makers and sporting goods brands jump on the band wagon and feature Parkour in movies and ads in and effort to look cool. Despite this commercialisation I think it’s kept quite grounded because of the heavy emphasis on the discipline and mental, almost spiritual, focus the founders placed on their sport. How French!
I think this will become even more popular, it fits in really well with the extreme-sport/skater sub-cultures. It’s also pretty cheap as there’s no special equipment, although I reckon you’d go through trainers like they grow on trees. And band-aids. Oh and probably a good idea to have private medical insurance. I’d take it up myself, it’d be brilliant for fitness and agility, but I’d be falling all over the place…not a pretty sight. Not to mention the heights, couldn’t do the whole high up thing.
Check out this video for a taste of Parkour, or see Urban Freeflow for some information on one of the biggest Parkour movements, based in the UK.
P
Popularity: 18% [?]
Search
Latest posts
Old favourites
Categories
- Accessibility (13)
- Automotive (10)
- Books (2)
- Conferences (33)
- Consulting (21)
- Design (6)
- Design research (24)
- Family (18)
- Humour (27)
- IA (40)
- Interactive marketing (3)
- Intranets (14)
- Music (14)
- Photos (7)
- Quotes (11)
- Ramblings (121)
- Speaking (17)
- Travel (23)
- Usability (24)
- User experience (35)
- Web 2.0 (6)
- Web design (44)
Archives
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
Where I do what you’re doing now
Code and technology
Creative and multimedia
Design research
KM, IM and strategy
Misc
UX, IA and IxD
- 37 signals signal vs noise
- Adaptive Path entries
- Andy Rutledge : Design View
- Austin Govella : Thinking and Making
- Boxes and Arrows
- Chris Khalil’s Musing
- Christina Wodtke : Eleganthack
- Christopher Fahey : Graphpaper
- Donna Maurer : DonnaM
- findability.org
- Good Experience
- Iain Barker : Simpler is Better
- InfoDesign
- Jared Spool : Brainsparks
- Jeff Veen
- Jesse James Garrett
- Joshua Ledwell : Compete on Usability
- Leisa Reichelt : Disambiguity
- Lou Rosenfeld : blougList
- Lyle Kantrovich
- Martin Hardee : Sun.com Design
- OK/Cancel
- Peter Merholz
- Peter Van Dijck’s Guide to Ease
- Shane Morris : UXB
- Steve Baty : Doc Holds Forth
- Todd Warfel
- UsableWorld
- UX Matters
- Zef Fugaz : zef[a]media


No Responses to “Not for the clumsy”
Please Wait
Leave a Reply